[GerateWohl]

Yes. And I agree that A.I. is not in the “truest” sense creative. Creativity suggests “original ideas” and “imagination”. A.I. has neither, A.I. has no original “ideas”, A.I. has no imagination. Which is why, unlike some, I am not worried that A.I. is anywhere near replacing creative artistry.

On the other hand much of so called creative work by humans could have easily been created by AI. The term “creativity” is used too inflationally.

I estimate about 90% of creative work is based on knowledge and experience which can easily be reproduced by AI. The remaining 10% are based on errors and misunderstandings, that get included into the process instead of being compensated.

By the way, in that creativity discussion I love that conversation from I, Robot: