Do you also dislike the phrase “This is a fun score”?
- This topic has 26 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks, 4 days ago by
GerateWohl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
15. November 2025 at 16:31 #6546
GerateWohlParticipantDo you also dislike the phrase “This is a fun score”? When people use that phrase to describe a score I can be sure about 90% that I won’t like the music when I hear it. It is something close to “To enjoy that movie you have to switch off your brain.”
It’s not these phrases themselves that bother me. It is just my experience that these phrases are usually used in context of scores or movies that I find bad.
Anybody similar experience?
15. November 2025 at 17:21 #6550
Thor Joachim HagaKeymasterYeah, me too. It’s particularly prevalent on JWFAN, but I’ve seen it elsewhere too.
I mean, there are plenty of “fun” scores out there, but it’s become a bit of an annoying shorthand when there is nothing else meaningful to say about a score. At the very least mix up the adjectives a little! Like, WHY is it fun?
15. November 2025 at 17:56 #6555
Nick ZwarParticipantThis is a fun thread.
16. November 2025 at 21:45 #6598
Thor Joachim HagaKeymasterYour face is fun.
16. November 2025 at 23:26 #6604
Nick ZwarParticipantFunny you mention it.
17. November 2025 at 10:32 #6616
Malte MüllerKeymasterThese puns are fun 😉 I am guilty of using that term often in the meaning of “guilty pleasure”. Or for “minor” scores of a composer that already has better or more original masterpiece scores in his ouvre.
17. November 2025 at 15:51 #6632
Nick ZwarParticipantTo get back to the topic, I suppose it depends on what you mean by “fun” score. I don’t think calling something a “fun” score automatically means it is a lesser score. I think Haydn’s Symphony No. 87 or Prokofiev’s Symphony No. 1, both among my all time favorite symphonies, are fun, fun in the best sense of the word. GREMLINS is a score I would consider “fun”, which doesn’t mean it isn’t also great. I think it is “fun” when a composer plays around with and subverts expectations. When Saint-Saens slows down the famous “Can-Can” for the tortoises, that’s just pure fun, as is the entire score.
17. November 2025 at 16:18 #6634
GerateWohlParticipantFor me personally it is less a question of what I consider fun. I don’t use that phrase. It is just an observation of mine that in about 90% of the cases when I read this phrase written by others it is about a score that I consider rather bland, uninteresting and sensationalistic.
In best case, yes, this can be kind of a guilty pleasure.
That does not mean that fun isn’t a feeling that I connect with film scores. But even when I have fun while listening to a particular score, I would never use that phrase “This is a fun score.” because this is usually used to say that people have very low expectations to this music.
Other people might have other experiences. That is why I asked the question.
17. November 2025 at 17:58 #6635
Thor Joachim HagaKeymasterThat sounds more like a personal connection you have, Gerate. Personally, I see no correlation between calling a score ‘fun’ and it being ‘bland or uninteresting’.
My only issue is the prevalent use of adjective itself, without further specifications.
17. November 2025 at 18:38 #6636
Nick ZwarParticipantI agree with Thor, it sounds like a more personal reservation against the phrase, which of course is fine. I would not hesitate to call Prokofiev’s first symphony “a really fun score”, but I would not mean that to denigrate the music, quite the contrary. But that’s just me, others may differ.
17. November 2025 at 19:15 #6637
GerateWohlParticipantThat sounds more like a personal connection you have, Gerate.
Right. That’s more or less exactly what I said. It is related to my taste and personal experience.
Others with different taste might say, if someone in a film music forum calls a soundtrack “a fun score” then they know that they will love it because they simply loves all scores that are called “a fun score” by other soundtrack fans.
But by my experience these scores are usually not my taste.
That’s what I said.17. November 2025 at 19:46 #6638
SigbjørnParticipantAgreed.
17. November 2025 at 19:49 #6639
SigbjørnParticipantI would not hesitate to call Prokofiev’s first symphony “a really fun score”,
Really makes all the difference. 😉
17. November 2025 at 19:51 #6640
Thor Joachim HagaKeymasterRight. That’s more or less exactly what I said. It is related to my taste and personal experience.
Others with different taste might say, if someone in a film music forum calls a soundtrack “a fun score” then they know that they will love it because they simply loves all scores that are called “a fun score” by other soundtrack fans.
But by my experience these scores are usually not my taste.
That’s what I said.Which you’re free to have, of course. We all have our connections.
I’m reminded of something sorta related. When I’ve discussed with colleagues, and they’ve been disparaging about a film, they’ve sometimes ended their argument with “but it’s got great entertainment value, I suppose”. A sort of reductive, faint praise when all else is lost. That’s often irritated me a little bit, especially if I love that same film for many other reasons than just its sheer entertainment value.
18. November 2025 at 06:18 #6644
SchilkemanParticipantI had a college professor who told us that if we were ever on a date with someone who described a film as “so good,” we should leave them by the side of the road and drive home. I suppose “fun” qualifies, too.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
